←back to thread

534 points BlueFalconHD | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.28s | source

I managed to reverse engineer the encryption (refered to as “Obfuscation” in the framework) responsible for managing the safety filters of Apple Intelligence models. I have extracted them into a repository. I encourage you to take a look around.
Show context
trebligdivad ◴[] No.44483981[source]
Some of the combinations are a bit weird, This one has lots of stuff avoiding death....together with a set ensuring all the Apple brands have the correct capitalisation. Priorities hey!

https://github.com/BlueFalconHD/apple_generative_model_safet...

replies(11): >>44483999 #>>44484073 #>>44484095 #>>44484410 #>>44484636 #>>44486072 #>>44487916 #>>44488185 #>>44488279 #>>44488362 #>>44488856 #
grues-dinner ◴[] No.44484073[source]
Interesting that it didn't seem to include "unalive".

Which as a phenomenon is so very telling that no one actually cares what people are really saying. Everyone, including the platforms knows what that means. It's all performative.

replies(11): >>44484164 #>>44484360 #>>44484635 #>>44484665 #>>44485033 #>>44485034 #>>44486246 #>>44487244 #>>44488055 #>>44488114 #>>44500918 #
j-krieger ◴[] No.44488114[source]
It's also a shining example of American puritanism. Asian models or those in Europe are far less censored.
replies(6): >>44488741 #>>44488993 #>>44489194 #>>44489626 #>>44489822 #>>44491464 #
notarobot123 ◴[] No.44488741[source]
I'm sure this has more to do with legal liability than morals.
replies(2): >>44489180 #>>44490757 #
1. jowea ◴[] No.44490757[source]
At first I thought of advertisers, but that is not relevant here, right?

But maybe it's not just legal liability but bad press too.