←back to thread

114 points dworks | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.439s | source
Show context
tengbretson ◴[] No.44482169[source]
In the LLM intellectual property paradigm, I think this registers as a solid "Who cares?" level offence.
replies(7): >>44482174 #>>44482176 #>>44482191 #>>44482209 #>>44482275 #>>44482276 #>>44482505 #
some_random ◴[] No.44482275[source]
Claiming to care deeply about IP theft in the more nebulous case of model training datasets then dismissing the extremely concrete case of outright theft seems pretty indefensible to me.
replies(3): >>44482363 #>>44482381 #>>44482529 #
Arainach ◴[] No.44482381[source]
Everyone has a finite amount of empathy, and I'm not going to waste any of mine on IP thieves complaining that someone stole their stolen IP from them.
replies(1): >>44483260 #
1. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.44483260[source]
It’s theft in the way taking a picture of nature that you had nothing to do with is theft.
replies(1): >>44483333 #
2. Arainach ◴[] No.44483333[source]
This line of argument was worn out and tired when 14 year olds on Napster were parroting it in 1999.