(interactions.acm.org)

561 points cxr | 1 comments | 05 Jul 25 23:10 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source

Show context

WarOnPrivacy ◴[06 Jul 25 00:57 UTC] No.44476845[source]▶

I drive a Toyota that is nearly old enough to run for US Senator. Every control in the car is visible, clearly labeled and is distinct to the touch - at all times. The action isn't impeded by routine activity or maintenance (ex:battery change).

Because it can be trivially duplicated, this is minimally capable engineering. Yet automakers everywhere lack even this level of competence. By reasonable measure, they are poor at their job.

replies(13): >>44476881 #>>44476892 #>>44477024 #>>44477518 #>>44477594 #>>44477656 #>>44478016 #>>44478375 #>>44480180 #>>44480505 #>>44481914 #>>44482166 #>>44482519 #

1. dfxm12 ◴[06 Jul 25 17:28 UTC] No.44482519[source]▶

>>44476845 #

By reasonable measure, they are poor at their job.

I don't think you can make this assertion without knowing what they were tasked with doing. I very much doubt they were tasked with making the most user friendly cockpit possible. I suspect they were required to minimize moving parts (like switches and buttons) and to enable things like Sirius, iPhone and Android integration, etc.

↑

Hidden interface controls that affect usability