The force-feeding of AI features on an unwilling public

I also find these features annoying and useless and wish they would go away. But that's not because LLMs are useless, nor because the public isn't using them (as daishi55 pointed out here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44479578)

It's because the integrations with existing products are arbitrary and poorly thought through, the same way that software imposed by executive fiat in BigCo offices for trend-chasing reasons has always been.

petekoomen made this point recently in a creative way: AI Horseless Carriages - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43773813 - April 2025 (478 comments)

I am a huge AI supporter, and use it extensively for coding, writing and most of my decision making processes, and I agree with you. The AI features in non-AI-first apps tend to be awkward bolt-ons, poorly thought out and using low quality models to save money.

I don't want shitty bolt-ons, I want to be able to give chatgtp/claude/gemini frontier models the ability to access my application data and make api calls for me to remotely drive tools.

[flagged]

Xss3 is paraphrasing. As CuriouslyC wrote:

> "I am a huge AI supporter, and use it extensively for [...] most of my decision making processes"

It's not a paraphrase, it's a misreading.

How do you get outsourcing from this? Maybe they're using it to organize their thoughts, explore alternatives. Nowhere do they say they're not still making the decisions themselves.

Nowhere did i say that either. You are misreading.

I said decision making process, as did they.

Nobody said that they are letting the AI make the decisions.