←back to thread

207 points lexandstuff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
WillAdams ◴[] No.44476982[source]
The late Marshall Brain's novella "Manna" touches on this:

https://marshallbrain.com/manna1

The idea of taxing computer sales to fund job re-training for displaced workers was brought up during the Carter administration.

replies(1): >>44477943 #
fy20 ◴[] No.44477943[source]
I came across this a couple of weeks ago, and it's a good read. I'd recommend it to everyone interested in this topic.

Althogh it was written somewhat as a warning, I feel Western countries (especially the US) are heading very much towards the terrafoam future. Mass immigration is making it hard to maintain order in some places, and if AI causes large unemployment it will only get worse.

replies(4): >>44478985 #>>44480303 #>>44481552 #>>44481816 #
1. WillAdams ◴[] No.44480303[source]
I don't want to get into politics, but to shift things slightly --- what technological and business structures might help to shift things for the better?

I rather regret not being able to justify buying:

https://daylightcomputer.com/

since it was set up as a public benefit corporation.

Similarly, there are co-operatives for electric still --- how are they handling solar? Do they afford an option to use one's share of the profits to purchase solar panels and batteries?

What would be an equivalent structure for an AI company which would actually be meaningful (and since circling back to politics is inevitable, enforceable)?