←back to thread

Problems the AI industry is not addressing adequately

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
197 points baylearn | 2 comments | 05 Jul 25 10:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.431s | source
Show context
bestouff ◴[05 Jul 25 11:10 UTC] No.44471877[source]▶
Are there some people here in HN believing in AGI "soonish" ?
replies(5): >>44471902 #>>44471982 #>>44472003 #>>44472071 #>>44472107 #
Davidzheng ◴[05 Jul 25 11:51 UTC] No.44472107[source]▶
what's your definition? AGI original definition is median human across almost all fields which I believe is basically achieved. If superhuman (better than best expert) I expect <2030 for all nonrobotic tasks and <2035 for all tasks
replies(3): >>44472644 #>>44473009 #>>44473060 #
GolfPopper ◴[05 Jul 25 14:23 UTC] No.44473009[source]▶
A "median human" can run a web search and report back on what they found without making stuff up, something I've yet to find an LLM capable of doing reliably.
replies(2): >>44473597 #>>44476492 #
1. Davidzheng ◴[05 Jul 25 15:55 UTC] No.44473597[source]▶
I bet you median humans make up a nontrivial amount of things. Humans misremember all the time. If you ask for only quotes, LLMs can also do this without problems (I use o3 for search over google)
replies(1): >>44478627 #
2. imtringued ◴[06 Jul 25 07:35 UTC] No.44478627[source]▶
Ah the classic "humans are fallible, AI is fallible, therefore AI is exactly like human intelligence".

I guess if you believe this, then the AI is already smarter than you.