←back to thread

369 points tareqak | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.881s | source
Show context
me551ah ◴[] No.44470473[source]
I doubt if this will make much difference. Offshoring as a tactic emerged in the pandemic when companies realised that being “remote” works just as well.

Sure, foreign R&D still gets amortized over 15 years (NPV ≈59 % of a full write-off, so you “lose” ~8.6 % of your R&D spend in present-value terms, and only 6.7 % of the cost is deductible in year 1, creating a 19.6 % cash-tax gap). But offshore wages are often 50–70 % below U.S. rates:

• Even after the slower amortization drag, hiring at half the cost nets you ~30 % total savings on R&D headcount.

• On a pure cash basis you only need ~20 % lower wages to break even; most offshore markets easily exceed that.

• So the labor-cost arbitrage far outweighs the tax timing penalty unless your foreign salaries are less than ~20 % below U.S. levels.

In short: the 15-year amort rule hurts your tax deduction, but 50 %+ lower offshore wages more than make up for it.

replies(7): >>44470502 #>>44470560 #>>44470669 #>>44470673 #>>44471236 #>>44471284 #>>44471500 #
eric-burel ◴[] No.44470560[source]
If I read properly this is explicitely targeting UE, Canada, UK and other countries with high wages and R&D and software engineering capabilities.
replies(1): >>44470805 #
tossandthrow ◴[] No.44470805[source]
Yep, seems like this is an opaque tarrif.

Other countries should use this when retaliating.

replies(1): >>44471426 #
munch117 ◴[] No.44471426[source]
If I'm understanding this correctly then this is about a tax disincentive, making it more expensive for US companies to poach R&D talent from other countries.

Not all countries will see that as a problem.

replies(1): >>44471574 #
tossandthrow ◴[] No.44471574[source]
The current administration is making a huge fuss out of VAT in Europe.
replies(1): >>44472113 #
1. MangoToupe ◴[] No.44472113[source]
Sadly, not to adopt such a sane taxation method....
replies(2): >>44472243 #>>44473108 #
2. tossandthrow ◴[] No.44472243[source]
No, lol! That would hamper the USs strongest asset: consumption!

which is likely being hampered anyways due to corporate greed in the financial sector - it is going to be interesting to see the actual breaking point for leveraged consumption

3. jandrewrogers ◴[] No.44473108[source]
That isn't really possible because American Constitution expressly prohibits it. There is no realistic possibility of modifying the Constitution to allow it either.

As far as the US Federal government is concerned it has little practical relevance.