←back to thread

336 points tareqak | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.945s | source
Show context
me551ah ◴[] No.44470473[source]
I doubt if this will make much difference. Offshoring as a tactic emerged in the pandemic when companies realised that being “remote” works just as well.

Sure, foreign R&D still gets amortized over 15 years (NPV ≈59 % of a full write-off, so you “lose” ~8.6 % of your R&D spend in present-value terms, and only 6.7 % of the cost is deductible in year 1, creating a 19.6 % cash-tax gap). But offshore wages are often 50–70 % below U.S. rates:

• Even after the slower amortization drag, hiring at half the cost nets you ~30 % total savings on R&D headcount.

• On a pure cash basis you only need ~20 % lower wages to break even; most offshore markets easily exceed that.

• So the labor-cost arbitrage far outweighs the tax timing penalty unless your foreign salaries are less than ~20 % below U.S. levels.

In short: the 15-year amort rule hurts your tax deduction, but 50 %+ lower offshore wages more than make up for it.

replies(7): >>44470502 #>>44470560 #>>44470669 #>>44470673 #>>44471236 #>>44471284 #>>44471500 #
eric-burel ◴[] No.44470560[source]
If I read properly this is explicitely targeting UE, Canada, UK and other countries with high wages and R&D and software engineering capabilities.
replies(1): >>44470805 #
1. tossandthrow ◴[] No.44470805[source]
Yep, seems like this is an opaque tarrif.

Other countries should use this when retaliating.

replies(1): >>44471426 #
2. munch117 ◴[] No.44471426[source]
If I'm understanding this correctly then this is about a tax disincentive, making it more expensive for US companies to poach R&D talent from other countries.

Not all countries will see that as a problem.

replies(1): >>44471574 #
3. tossandthrow ◴[] No.44471574[source]
The current administration is making a huge fuss out of VAT in Europe.
replies(1): >>44472113 #
4. MangoToupe ◴[] No.44472113{3}[source]
Sadly, not to adopt such a sane taxation method....