←back to thread

Nvidia won, we all lost

(blog.sebin-nyshkim.net)
977 points todsacerdoti | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.682s | source
Show context
__turbobrew__ ◴[] No.44468824[source]
> With over 90% of the PC market running on NVIDIA tech, they’re the clear winner of the GPU race. The losers are every single one of us.

I have been rocking AMD GPU ever since the drivers were upstreamed into the linux kernel. No regrets.

I have also realized that there is a lot out there in the world besides video games, and getting all in a huff about it isn’t worth my time or energy. But consumer gotta consoooooom and then cry and outrage when they are exploited instead of just walking away and doing something else.

Same with magic the gathering, the game went to shit and so many people got outraged and in a big huff but they still spend thousands on the hobby. I just stopped playing mtg.

replies(22): >>44468885 #>>44468985 #>>44469036 #>>44469146 #>>44469164 #>>44470357 #>>44470480 #>>44470607 #>>44471458 #>>44471685 #>>44471784 #>>44471811 #>>44472146 #>>44472400 #>>44473527 #>>44473828 #>>44473856 #>>44476633 #>>44485501 #>>44487391 #>>44489487 #>>44493815 #
darkoob12 ◴[] No.44470357[source]
I am not a gamer and don't why AMD GPUs aren't good enough. It's weird since both Xbox and PlayStation are using AMD GPUs.

I guess there games that you can only play on PC with Nvidia graphics. That begs the question why someone create a game and ignore large console market.

replies(9): >>44470371 #>>44470393 #>>44470614 #>>44470709 #>>44471156 #>>44472918 #>>44473655 #>>44476308 #>>44479276 #
datagram ◴[] No.44470709[source]
AMD cards are fine from a raw performance perspective, but Nvidia has built themselves a moat of software/hardware features like ray-tracing, video encoding, CUDA, DLSS, etc where AMD's equivalents have simply not been as good.

With their current generation of cards AMD has caught up on all of those things except CUDA, and Intel is in a similar spot now that they've had time to improve their drivers, so it's pretty easy now to buy a non-Nvidia card without feeling like you're giving anything up.

replies(2): >>44470751 #>>44470848 #
jezze ◴[] No.44470848[source]
I have no experience of using it so I might be wrong but AMD has ROCm which has something called HIP that should be comparable to CUDA. I think it also has a way to automatically translate CUDA calls into HIP as well so it should work without the need to modify your code.
replies(4): >>44470886 #>>44471442 #>>44472280 #>>44472309 #
1. tankenmate ◴[] No.44471442[source]
`I think it also has a way to automatically translate CUDA calls`

I suspect the thing you're referring to is ZLUDA[0], it allows you to run CUDA code on a range of non NVidia hardware (for some value of "run").

[0] https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA

replies(1): >>44473140 #
2. smallmancontrov ◴[] No.44473140[source]
For an extremely flexible value of "run" that you would be extremely unwise to allow anywhere near a project whose success you have a stake in.
replies(1): >>44473933 #
3. tankenmate ◴[] No.44473933[source]
To quote "The Dude"; "Well ... ummm ... that's ... ahh ... just your opinion man". There are people who are successfully running it in production, but of course depending on your code, YMMV.