←back to thread

191 points aorloff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
andy99 ◴[] No.44467803[source]
Most interesting to me is that people are worried about a $2B transaction moving the market.

How does that compare to the market depth of actual currencies or commodities? BTC, being objectively worthless, must be much more sensitive to people wanting to sell I'd expect.

replies(3): >>44467823 #>>44471162 #>>44471344 #
bboygravity ◴[] No.44467823[source]
How is BTC objectively worthless (I'm guessing you mean "intrinsicly worthlesss"?) as opposed to USD or other major currencies?
replies(3): >>44467871 #>>44467957 #>>44470660 #
anothernewdude ◴[] No.44467871[source]
Other currencies get their value because the governments that provide them make people pay taxes. If you want to pay the tax the US government charges you, you're going to need some USD - so there's guaranteed demand, and hence intrinsic worth.

There's also other debt that the US government provides in USD - which provides value as well, in the form of bonds.

BTC has no such driver of wealth. Except perhaps money laundering/transfers without AML provisions.

replies(4): >>44467888 #>>44467911 #>>44467952 #>>44468271 #
logicchains ◴[] No.44467911[source]
>Other currencies get their value because the governments that provide them make people pay taxes

That's demonstrably false, because countries like Zimbabwe and Venezuela experienced hyperinflation (the complete devaluation of a currency) in spite of the fact that their governments were still forcing people to pay taxes with those currencies. So clearly that alone is not enough to provide intrinsic worth to a currency.

replies(2): >>44467967 #>>44471549 #
1. PartiallyTyped ◴[] No.44467967[source]
The reason for that devaluation is that trust was eroded. GP's premise is correct, that fiat has value because of governments, but the reasoning here is not fully correct. The value is in the trust that the government and the institutions will continue to function properly.