←back to thread

291 points jshchnz | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.446s | source

Soham Parekh is all the rage on Twitter right now with a bunch of startups coming out of the woodwork saying they either had currently employed him or had in the past.

Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?

Show context
dazzeloid ◴[] No.44449134[source]
he's a really talented engineer, crushed our interviews. the funny thing was that he actually had multiple companies on his linkedin at the same time, including ours. we just thought they must have been internships or something and he never updated them (he felt a bit chaotic). but then it turned out he was working at all of them simultaneously.

worked for us for almost a year and did a solid job (we also let him go when we discovered the multiple jobs)

replies(5): >>44449220 #>>44449255 #>>44453662 #>>44467965 #>>44473285 #
the_real_cher ◴[] No.44449255[source]
Why would you let him go if he was doing a solid job?
replies(6): >>44449394 #>>44449417 #>>44450584 #>>44451975 #>>44454050 #>>44473675 #
avmich ◴[] No.44449417[source]
Yeah, this looks like a cargo culting. Don't need work, need the guy to belong only to them...
replies(3): >>44450718 #>>44454272 #>>44472683 #
gk1 ◴[] No.44454272[source]
People who practice overemployment delude themselves that multiple jobs doesn’t affect their performance and therefore there’s nothing wrong with working multiple jobs. Their subreddit is a dumbfounding echo chamber.

I had an “over-employed” person on my team (who lied about it) and I can confirm what all others are saying about this guy: they start going AWOL, miss important discussions, miss deadlines, blame their colleagues (creating toxic culture), start doing shoddy work because they’re not thinking deeply through problems and also to keep expectations low, create busywork for others to take the pressure off themselves, use company resources and accounts for other projects (creating security issues, among others)… just to name a few reasons.

It’s not about possessiveness. Many co’s are glad to hire contractors, who don’t “belong” to them.

replies(2): >>44456358 #>>44465020 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.44456358[source]
> People who practice overemployment delude themselves that multiple jobs doesn’t affect their performance and therefore there’s nothing wrong with working multiple jobs. Their subreddit is a dumbfounding echo chamber.

It blows my mind that overemployed people have become folk heroes. They're obviously not putting full effort into two jobs.

I had the same experience as you with an "overemployed" person: Working with them is really bad for everyone else. They lie, play extreme politics, throw teammates under the bus, make you work harder for everything, and they don't care if it causes you harm because you're just a temporary coworker at one of their "Js"

There's nothing to celebrate about these people. They screw over their teammates far more than the company they work for.

replies(5): >>44459130 #>>44459999 #>>44463412 #>>44467311 #>>44467991 #
ponector ◴[] No.44459999[source]
> It blows my mind that overemployed people have become folk heroes. They're obviously not putting full effort into two jobs

What blows my mind is people think overemployment of an engineer is bad, but it is more than acceptable for CEO to held top positions in different companies.

replies(3): >>44464784 #>>44465347 #>>44466171 #
1. oceanplexian ◴[] No.44464784[source]
CEOs get fired too when a board with sufficient power doesn’t feel like they are performing.

The difference is in most cases the CEO owns the business or a good chunk of it so they’re actually capital owners and employees in name only. If you own the business you make the rules.

replies(1): >>44473940 #
2. betaby ◴[] No.44473940[source]
> If you own the business you make the rules.

To the extent.

I own my skills and I make the rules. To the extent.