←back to thread

Major reversal in ocean circulation detected in the Southern Ocean

(www.icm.csic.es)
480 points riffraff | 2 comments | 04 Jul 25 04:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.448s | source
Show context
dang ◴[04 Jul 25 09:51 UTC] No.44463006[source]▶
[stub for offtopicness]
replies(15): >>44461279 #>>44461280 #>>44461309 #>>44461334 #>>44461385 #>>44461408 #>>44461448 #>>44461634 #>>44461664 #>>44461731 #>>44461790 #>>44462060 #>>44462362 #>>44462565 #>>44462687 #
anvandare[dead post] ◴[04 Jul 25 05:33 UTC] No.44461408[source]▶
[flagged]
flanked-evergl[dead post] ◴[04 Jul 25 05:48 UTC] No.44461481[source]▶
[flagged]
saubeidl ◴[04 Jul 25 08:20 UTC] No.44462384[source]▶
Climate will disrupt society if we don't act.

People are proposing comparatively minor fixes to avoid unmitigated disaster.

replies(1): >>44463789 #
flanked-evergl ◴[04 Jul 25 12:03 UTC] No.44463789[source]▶
The simplest action is nuclear, why do no prominent climate activist groups support this? Why is the solution always something stupid like giving toxic chemicals to cows or to switching to paper straws when drinking out of plastic lined cups?

The answer is simple: They want societal collapse, and the reason why they are getting more and more violent and switching to other causes is because the societal collapse promised to them by climate change is not coming, and it looks like it will never come.

replies(1): >>44463857 #
1. saubeidl ◴[04 Jul 25 12:14 UTC] No.44463857[source]▶
Many climate activists are pro-nuclear. You built yourself a strawman to argue against.
replies(1): >>44464047 #
2. flanked-evergl ◴[04 Jul 25 12:48 UTC] No.44464047[source]▶
Of the most prominent climate activist groups, which are pro-nuclear?