←back to thread

Ubuntu 25.10 Raises RISC-V Profile Requirements

(www.omgubuntu.co.uk)
126 points bundie | 1 comments | 01 Jul 25 08:32 UTC | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
csense ◴[03 Jul 25 22:42 UTC] No.44459751[source]▶
Can you write a kernel patch / driver to trap the unsupported instructions and provide software implementations?
replies(2): >>44459767 #>>44461893 #
karlgkk ◴[03 Jul 25 22:46 UTC] No.44459767[source]▶
Rva20 lacks vector support and hypervisor instructions, among other things.

You’re welcome to put a ton of effort in for dogshit performance on a bunch or $35 SBCs but the rest of us will just upgrade

And don’t worry, some vendor won’t come in and magically save you - fedora is eyeing rv22 as their baseline.

replies(4): >>44460056 #>>44460232 #>>44460237 #>>44460407 #
CursedSilicon ◴[04 Jul 25 01:23 UTC] No.44460407[source]▶
Can you rephrase your answer in a way that isn't brutally and unnecessarily hostile?
replies(1): >>44461692 #
karlgkk ◴[04 Jul 25 06:31 UTC] No.44461692[source]▶
Honestly, it's because of the "can you do a ton of unpaid work to support my niche, non-commercial application" attitude of the OP, which I find to be extremely distasteful.

It's something I deal with frequently. I should not have taken it out on OP and I agree I could have communicated that much better.

Unfortunately, I can't edit my post or I would rephrase it significantly.

Sorry to user "Levitating", I was being a dick.

replies(1): >>44463258 #
1. jraph ◴[04 Jul 25 10:36 UTC] No.44463258[source]▶
> Honestly, it's because of the "can you do a ton of unpaid work to support my niche, non-commercial application" attitude of the OP, which I find to be extremely distasteful.

I understood their "Can you" as "Can one [theoretically]", more on the curiosity side than on the entitled side.