←back to thread

252 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.395s | source
Show context
dperfect ◴[] No.44457890[source]
To the comments hating on grain: everything naturally has some amount of noise or grain - even the best digital sensors. Heck, even your eyes do. It's useful beyond just aesthetics. It tends to increase perceived sharpness and hides flaws like color banding and compression artifacts.

That's not to say that all noise and grain is good. It can be unavoidable, due to inferior technology, or a result of poor creative choices. It can even be distracting. But the alternative where everything undergoes denoising (which many of our cameras do by default now) is much worse in my opinion. To my eyes, the smoothing that happens with denoising often looks unrealistic and far more distracting.

replies(3): >>44457952 #>>44461125 #>>44463090 #
dylan604 ◴[] No.44457952[source]
My issue is that grain is good based on the creative decisions of the creators of the content. It is not something that a group of nerds compressing 1s and 0s should be making
replies(2): >>44458051 #>>44461224 #
1. indolering ◴[] No.44461224[source]
We live in a world of resource constraints. The nerds compressing 1s and 0s are very much concerned about creative intent. They noticed that compression wrecks that creative intent and wanted to better communicate it in a world with bandwidth limitations.