←back to thread

290 points jshchnz | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source

Soham Parekh is all the rage on Twitter right now with a bunch of startups coming out of the woodwork saying they either had currently employed him or had in the past.

Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?

Show context
bibek_poudel ◴[] No.44449018[source]
I read through one of his emails. This guy is great at communicating his interest and signaling himself as a "high performer".

Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews. No wonder, he's been through so many of them.

replies(2): >>44449180 #>>44458423 #
1. mathiaspoint ◴[] No.44449180[source]
Interviewing really is a distinct skill from contributing and the more people crank it the more it seems to test for interview ability.
replies(2): >>44465129 #>>44478489 #
2. skeeter2020 ◴[] No.44465129[source]
I suspect (and have seen some evidence) that the interviews he aced were algo-based. Doing well in these is very repeatable, with low additional effort. Behavioural are much harder to do at scale.
3. ninetyninenine ◴[] No.44478489[source]
IQ tests are also distinct skills but IQ scores are the most quantifiable and studied numbers in all of psychology and correlate with all kinds of things like job performance.

I think the purpose of the interview is the same thing. Even though there's no strong evidence for a correlation it's reasonable to believe intuitively that there is.