←back to thread

186 points pseudolus | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.648s | source
Show context
GeekyBear ◴[] No.44434645[source]
The standard practice for commercial crops is to bring in commercial hives of bees for pollination season that are shipped together via truck from crop to crop and region to region.

https://sweetharvestfoods.com/the-commercial-honey-bee-trave...

That sounds like a great opportunity to spread the resistant parasites from hive to hive and region to region.

replies(5): >>44434867 #>>44434899 #>>44434963 #>>44435195 #>>44435737 #
Spivak ◴[] No.44434899[source]
Unless we change our farming practices there isn't much else you can do. You have acres and acres of land that are completely dead (as far as pollinators are concerned) for almost all of the year and then suddenly every plant blooms all at once and then goes away.
replies(2): >>44435014 #>>44435029 #
humblebeekeeper ◴[] No.44435014[source]
This is what so few people realize -- farming, as it's practiced in the US, is basically mining.

It might appear to be lush nature, but the places we farm are deserts in many ways. We kill insect life, birds, mammals, and other supporting species. We remove most of nutrients from the soil and replace them chemically. A commercial orchard might as well be an Amazon datacenter from an environmental standpoint.

If we want to change things, we need to fundamentally alter the way we grow food. It will be a bit harder -- we'll need regenerative methods, less reliable methods, more human labor, more weed prone, etc. -- but we can build food production into something that's much more sustainable and ecologically sound.

Some farmers are already doing this, or experimenting with it, and I think there's at the very least a growing soil health mindset among small farmers.

replies(4): >>44435073 #>>44435250 #>>44435961 #>>44436378 #
nancyminusone ◴[] No.44435250[source]
I like to bring this up in regards to livestock. "If we shouldn't eat chickens, then why are they food shaped?" Well, they are food shaped! Most of the animals we eat are designed to be eaten, born and bred over thousands of years to achieve that goal. A chicken is a most unnatural animal. No other bird has any reason to lay 300 eggs per year.

Livestock is as GMO as they come, just on a longer scale.

replies(2): >>44435739 #>>44435923 #
triceratops ◴[] No.44435923[source]
The comment you responded to didn't say anything about GMO
replies(1): >>44436417 #
1. datameta ◴[] No.44436417[source]
The comment GP responded to was talking about how we have modified the environments of farms - talking about GMO livestock is a stone's toss away.
replies(1): >>44436484 #
2. humblebeekeeper ◴[] No.44436484[source]
FWIW, I am not opposed to GMOs broadly. But I am opposed to GMOs for the purpose of enabling more industrialization in agriculture. I don't see, e.g., red grapefruits as bad, even though they used an early form of genetic engineering (seeds were exposed to radiation in hopes of creating random mutations.)
replies(1): >>44436557 #
3. datameta ◴[] No.44436557[source]
I think I see your viewpoint and agree with it. It isn't a matter of "do we modify or not" but rather "how, when, and for what purpose? who benefits? does this damage the land or species lineage? etc"