←back to thread

209 points alexcos | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
rozab ◴[] No.44414734[source]
I just wrote a reply to a comment talking about the AI tells this writing has, but it got flagged so my comment disappeared when I hit post. I'll rephrase out of spite:

My first thought upon reading this was that an LLM had been instructed to add a pithy meme joke to each paragraph. They don't make sense in context, and while some terminally online people do speak in memes, those people aren't quoting doge in 2025.

There's also a sense of incoherence in the whole piece. For instance, this section:

"- after: 22 million videos + 1 million images (now we're talking)

they basically hoovered up everything: something-something v2, kinetics, howto100m, and a billion youtube videos"

Was it a billion vids or 22m? It turns out the latter sentence is just rephrasing the list of sources in a cool casual way, and the last one is called YT-Temporal-1B. That's a billion frames of video, not a billion videos.

replies(9): >>44418463 #>>44418645 #>>44419342 #>>44419612 #>>44420681 #>>44420757 #>>44421442 #>>44422175 #>>44426050 #
wincy ◴[] No.44420757[source]
I don’t know, 400k people are listening to the White House streaming lo-fi hip hop on X right now with cutesy videos of Trump on one side and his executive orders streaming on the other at 4am. I think there’s plenty of people quoting doge in 2025.

If you’re in the US, you likely work with them and they have learned to studiously avoid talking about politics except in vagaries to avoid conflict.

replies(1): >>44421737 #
1. bazhova ◴[] No.44421737[source]
they are referring to doge the dog meme, not the government initiative. The meme is much older and wouldn't be considered "cool" to use by the same people who write in the style of the article. Which indicates it was written by an LLM, because usually only things like ChatGPT throw in such cringe, out of date memes in an otherwise obnoxiously 2025 article