←back to thread

The $25k car is going extinct?

(media.hubspot.com)
319 points pseudolus | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.762s | source
Show context
snovymgodym ◴[] No.44414559[source]
It's pretty simple (in the US, can't speak for elsewhere).

There are 2 big factors at play:

1. Margins. Manufacturers make huge margins on expensive vehicles and very slim margins on cheap vehicles. The numbers differ, but I think even in the lead up to the 2008 crisis automakers had to sell 5-10 "econobox" cars to make the profit they made on one luxury car, SUV, or truck.

2. Normalization of debt. For many Americans, having a monthly car payment in perpetuity is considered acceptable. Car loans have their place and can be used responsibly, but due to marketing, sales tactics, and cultural sensibilities what often ends up happening is that people start from a monthly dollar amount and then work forwards to buy the most expensive vehicle they can, even if it means taking the loan term out to 72 or 84 months. It's also very normal for people to never pay off their car, instead trading in the vehicle after 3-5 years and rolling equity in the loan over to their next car. Obviously, this consumer habit is great for dealers, manufacturers, creditors and buyers of consumer debt, as well as the US Government and investors -- it's just not ideal for the consumers themselves if they're trying to preserve wealth and build savings.

These two factors create an environment increasingly hostile to the cheap entry level car. Consumer demand is low since most don't spend responsibly, and automakers don't really want to make or sell them because the margins are so slim.

replies(8): >>44415022 #>>44415542 #>>44418250 #>>44418936 #>>44419132 #>>44419293 #>>44420084 #>>44422027 #
BLKNSLVR ◴[] No.44418936[source]
My reptilian-brain logic prevents me from even considering getting a loan for car. Houses increase in value, therefore it makes a certain amount of sense to get a loan / mortgage for the purchase of a house (but mainly because no-one - in the world in which I live - can afford to buy one cash).

Cars decrease in value, very quickly. Getting a loan for a car is throwing more money away than buying a car in the first place.

Having said that, I'm immune to a lot of 'social norms' so I've been fine driving my tired-looking 20-year old Outlander soccer mum car or our 10+ year old grannymobile Nissan Leaf.

There are situations in which a loan for a car may be necessary, but I'd have to be a really tight spot to consider it, and I'd be absolutely minimising the size / length of it.

replies(6): >>44419159 #>>44419185 #>>44419682 #>>44420224 #>>44420754 #>>44420967 #
xyzzy123 ◴[] No.44419185[source]
I think the way most people rationalise it, it's a pre-requisite for having a job. So it's income-generating and therefore morally ok to take out a loan for it.
replies(1): >>44420449 #
1. oblio ◴[] No.44420449[source]
Which is just so many degrees of insane that it's even hard to list all of them.
replies(1): >>44422528 #
2. criddell ◴[] No.44422528[source]
You could list a few, otherwise I'm just guessing at what you mean.

Your work requires expensive gear - maybe it's a car, or smartphone, or computer, or ebike, or HVAC tools, or camera, or musical instrument - why not pay for them over time as they help generate income?

replies(1): >>44422721 #
3. oblio ◴[] No.44422721[source]
I mean that you shouldn't need a car to get a job, for absolutely all types of work.

For example a doctor or a waiter doesn't need a car to do their job, once they're at their workplace.

The US is basically forcing everyone to commute by car, except for select and limited geographies.