←back to thread

300 points pseudolus | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
Dumblydorr ◴[] No.44409135[source]
Most musicians who can make it now are only middle class, with a handful of superstars and a huge legion of poor artists.

I’ve played many gigs for $20-100, which is once a month or week and tough work relative to typing some code from home. I played for 25 mins in front of 1000 people and spent 8+ hours total all-in to make 200 bucks. Way harder money than coding.

Really, think back through history. Musicians were needed for dance, parties, all occasions. Now hit play on your phone connected to a speaker, GG musicians.

replies(4): >>44410313 #>>44411274 #>>44412506 #>>44412700 #
bamboozled ◴[] No.44410313[source]
Now hit play on your phone connected to a speaker, GG musicians.

Not really comparable experience though.

replies(2): >>44410455 #>>44410758 #
1. galkk ◴[] No.44410758[source]
To some extent it is much better.

More reliable, no divas, no drunk musicians, always on time, the repertoire is literally unlimited.

replies(2): >>44411284 #>>44414662 #
2. LtWorf ◴[] No.44411284[source]
Compare dating to buying onlyfans…
replies(1): >>44412642 #
3. kupfer ◴[] No.44412642[source]
"Strip club visit to onlyfans" is more apt
replies(1): >>44415963 #
4. spacemadness ◴[] No.44414662[source]
This reminds me of the guy that told me he didn’t need to travel anywhere because the internet exists and people already write about it and leave pictures. This was in the 90s. Not the same obviously. And I agree that crowds can be super annoying sometimes. And it obviously depends on the context of the type of music created, etc. But in your nicely controlled environment you can miss out on spontaneity or energy that can’t be replaced.
replies(1): >>44420414 #
5. LtWorf ◴[] No.44415963{3}[source]
Nah in small enough venues you sit down and have a beer with the musicians :D
6. bamboozled ◴[] No.44420414[source]
That's a wonderful analogy...