←back to thread

18 points stogot | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
VivaTechnics ◴[] No.44402671[source]
He argues:

There must be an underlying deterministic system. - We don’t know what it is yet. - Quantum mechanics is incomplete, not wrong — it hides deeper rules. - His belief is based on logic, not current experimental proof.

In short, he says we don’t know what it is, but it’s something out there.

replies(3): >>44403080 #>>44403235 #>>44403239 #
1. AndrewDucker ◴[] No.44403235[source]
He seems to have decided there has to be a classical basis underlying quantum results. But offers no reasoning as to why he believes this. I'm sceptical.