←back to thread

94 points mikece | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.65s | source
Show context
ceejayoz ◴[] No.44397838[source]
So how broad is this?

Can a state now require you to verify your age and identity to read a newspaper they don't like?

replies(3): >>44397882 #>>44397903 #>>44397939 #
giarc ◴[] No.44397939[source]
Not unless that newspaper is "more than one-third sexual material".
replies(9): >>44397951 #>>44397995 #>>44398006 #>>44398008 #>>44398035 #>>44398053 #>>44398103 #>>44398383 #>>44399422 #
1. khy ◴[] No.44398103[source]
So a site just needs to generate enough content until its under that threshold?
replies(1): >>44398433 #
2. WarOnPrivacy ◴[] No.44398433[source]
> So a site just needs to generate enough content until its under that threshold?

No. That alone is highly unlikely to prevent performative lawsuits from state attorney generals. Especially (but not limited to) AGs who are intent on satisfying their culture war kink.