←back to thread

Alternative Layout System

(alternativelayoutsystem.com)
396 points smartmic | 3 comments | 26 Jun 25 19:31 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gtr32x ◴[26 Jun 25 21:48 UTC] No.44391825[source]▶
Author made frequent reference to Hebrew text, is there a particular reason historical Hebrew texts uses these methods?
replies(1): >>44392420 #
elchananHaas ◴[26 Jun 25 23:23 UTC] No.44392420[source]▶
Yes. A combination of being hand copied and the text having no punctuation.
replies(1): >>44392691 #
1. Fellshard ◴[27 Jun 25 00:10 UTC] No.44392691[source]▶
Could it also be an artifact of using scrolls, and needing to sharply delimit 'pages' of text?
replies(1): >>44392732 #
2. rhet0rica ◴[27 Jun 25 00:18 UTC] No.44392732[source]▶
No. Both Torah scrolls and ancient Greco-Roman papyrus scrolls are written sideways, in columns of a consistent width. The rollers are held in the hands.

Modern fantasy depictions of vertical scrolls leave an erroneous impression that the book proceeds in a downward direction, in addition to the cliché use of 'see above' to prefer to anything previously in the text. Hypertext media and text editors further support this misunderstanding by applying continuous scrolling to a document. This confusion is quite new, perhaps as recent as the 1980s.

replies(1): >>44398872 #
3. JonathonW ◴[27 Jun 25 18:00 UTC] No.44398872[source]▶
Scrolls written in a single column and "scrolled" vertically (like a modern text editor or web browser) weren't completely unheard of, particularly for liturgical or legal documents. See http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/viewFile/9191/4607

But, yeah, the horizontal format would've been more common.