←back to thread

248 points paulpauper | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.949s | source
Show context
casenmgreen ◴[] No.44380132[source]
Freakonomics argued that crime correlates to whether or not abortion is available.

If it is not, crime rates are up, and by a lot.

If it is, crime rates are down.

When you flip from one to the other, takes about 15/20 years for the effect to show up.

Rationale is that forcing parents to have their kids when they're not ready for them significantly increases delinquency in young adults.

This is apparently the only possible theory at the moment. It's not proven, of course, but the other theories which were given have been found lacking. This is the only theory which has some evidence, and hasn't been found to be wrong.

replies(12): >>44380236 #>>44380242 #>>44380310 #>>44380312 #>>44380327 #>>44383084 #>>44383620 #>>44383640 #>>44385706 #>>44386754 #>>44387979 #>>44388103 #
gosub100 ◴[] No.44380242[source]
Why abortion and not contraceptives?
replies(4): >>44380289 #>>44380290 #>>44380421 #>>44382135 #
iknowstuff ◴[] No.44380290[source]
Why not both
replies(1): >>44381175 #
gosub100 ◴[] No.44381175[source]
one can be prevented by the other
replies(2): >>44381210 #>>44382792 #
1. nkrisc ◴[] No.44382792[source]
No contraceptive method is 100% effective.
replies(1): >>44382944 #
2. gosub100 ◴[] No.44382944[source]
hence "can be"
replies(2): >>44384663 #>>44386310 #
3. OKRainbowKid ◴[] No.44384663[source]
Hence "both".
4. nkrisc ◴[] No.44386310[source]
We don’t need airbags because injury can be prevented by seatbelts.
replies(1): >>44389124 #
5. gosub100 ◴[] No.44389124{3}[source]
The "don't need" part is a fictitious part you inserted into the argument and not a claim I made.

Injury "can be" prevented by seatbelts, that is a valid claim.