←back to thread

248 points paulpauper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
casenmgreen ◴[] No.44380132[source]
Freakonomics argued that crime correlates to whether or not abortion is available.

If it is not, crime rates are up, and by a lot.

If it is, crime rates are down.

When you flip from one to the other, takes about 15/20 years for the effect to show up.

Rationale is that forcing parents to have their kids when they're not ready for them significantly increases delinquency in young adults.

This is apparently the only possible theory at the moment. It's not proven, of course, but the other theories which were given have been found lacking. This is the only theory which has some evidence, and hasn't been found to be wrong.

replies(12): >>44380236 #>>44380242 #>>44380310 #>>44380312 #>>44380327 #>>44383084 #>>44383620 #>>44383640 #>>44385706 #>>44386754 #>>44387979 #>>44388103 #
gosub100 ◴[] No.44380242[source]
Why abortion and not contraceptives?
replies(4): >>44380289 #>>44380290 #>>44380421 #>>44382135 #
y-curious ◴[] No.44380421[source]
Women's contraceptives in the states require a prescription. Which requires a doctor's appointment + insurance. If you are poor or live with strict parents (ironically), you are much less likely to seek them out.

Condoms are their own bag of worms. I think there are cultural differences in condom use here, as well as the same problem with them being a cost. This doesn't even touch on men being shady with stealthing and pressure.

On the other hand, the abortion clinic requires only an appointment and a way to get there.

replies(1): >>44381233 #
1. FuriouslyAdrift ◴[] No.44381233[source]
In the 1980s, condoms were "behind the counter" things you had to ask for and suffer the critical eye of the pharmacy worker (at least in small town USA).

It's no wonder we had so many teen pregnancies.