←back to thread

302 points mastermaq | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
hbn ◴[] No.44370715[source]
My work gives us Copilot access since We're a Microsoft Shop™

It's too bad Copilot is by far the dumbest competitor in the space

My favorite interaction so far was when I prompted it with:

    ffmpeg command to convert movie.mov into a reasonably sized mp4
Sure, it's not the most direction instructions, but I tend to give it just enough to get the job done, assuming the LLM knows what its purpose is as an LLM, and it always works with the other chatbots.

Copilot's response:

    I implemented and executed the Python code above to convert movie.mov to a reasonably sized movie.mp4 using ffmpeg.
    
    However, the Python code failed since it was not able to find and access movie.mov file.
    Do you want me to try again or is there anything else that I can help you with?
Note that I didn't cut anything out. It didn't actually provide me any "Python code above"
replies(22): >>44370829 #>>44371002 #>>44371022 #>>44371053 #>>44371065 #>>44371287 #>>44371335 #>>44371358 #>>44371628 #>>44371891 #>>44371914 #>>44371978 #>>44372301 #>>44372892 #>>44373260 #>>44373493 #>>44373864 #>>44374419 #>>44374747 #>>44376761 #>>44377612 #>>44379849 #
hu3 ◴[] No.44371022[source]
What model? It got right first try here with your exact prompt using the free GPT-4.1 model.

https://i.imgur.com/toLzwCk.png

ffmpeg -i movie.mov -c:v libx264 -preset medium -crf 23 -c:a aac -b:a 128k movie.mp4

BUT, I have this in my copilot-instructions.md file:

    # Always follow these steps when responding to any request
    1. Please do a round of thinking in <thinking></thinking> tags
    2. Then a round of self-critique in <critique></critique> tags
    3. Then a final round of <thinking>, before responding.
    4. If you need more information, ask for it.
replies(1): >>44371054 #
easton ◴[] No.44371054[source]
That's GitHub Copilot, not "microsoft copilot", the bot built into the Microsoft 365 landing site. it doesn't give you model options, for example.
replies(3): >>44371112 #>>44371965 #>>44372474 #
clvx ◴[] No.44371112[source]
Whoever decided to use the same brand for different experiences should be demoted at minimum. What a way to destroy trust.
replies(8): >>44371158 #>>44371171 #>>44371521 #>>44371620 #>>44371716 #>>44371752 #>>44371783 #>>44373490 #
airstrike ◴[] No.44371158[source]
I suggest you never visit https://www.office.com/
replies(7): >>44371762 #>>44371935 #>>44372729 #>>44372743 #>>44374715 #>>44375584 #>>44376883 #
9cb14c1ec0 ◴[] No.44372729[source]
Microsoft Office is one of the most recognizable and valuable brands ever. I'm quite terrible at marketing, and even I can recognize how stupid the rebrand was.
replies(3): >>44372732 #>>44374529 #>>44375291 #
airstrike ◴[] No.44372732[source]
Literally this. It's one of the strongest names in all of software. It really boggles the mind.
replies(2): >>44374608 #>>44380537 #
olyjohn ◴[] No.44374608[source]
I thought that renaming Active Directory to Entra ID was bad. Every single tech person who ever touched a Windows server knows what AD is. Then they change to name to something that sounds like it's going to give you an anal probe. What a dumpster fire...
replies(1): >>44377680 #
1. bradstewart ◴[] No.44377680[source]
Thank you for this. As someone who recently had to stumble back into turning a few knobs in (what I thought would be) AD for Office 365 licensing needs, after ~10 years outside of the MS sandbox, I had no earthly idea what Entra was. Until right now.