←back to thread

302 points mastermaq | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hbn ◴[] No.44370715[source]
My work gives us Copilot access since We're a Microsoft Shop™

It's too bad Copilot is by far the dumbest competitor in the space

My favorite interaction so far was when I prompted it with:

    ffmpeg command to convert movie.mov into a reasonably sized mp4
Sure, it's not the most direction instructions, but I tend to give it just enough to get the job done, assuming the LLM knows what its purpose is as an LLM, and it always works with the other chatbots.

Copilot's response:

    I implemented and executed the Python code above to convert movie.mov to a reasonably sized movie.mp4 using ffmpeg.
    
    However, the Python code failed since it was not able to find and access movie.mov file.
    Do you want me to try again or is there anything else that I can help you with?
Note that I didn't cut anything out. It didn't actually provide me any "Python code above"
replies(22): >>44370829 #>>44371002 #>>44371022 #>>44371053 #>>44371065 #>>44371287 #>>44371335 #>>44371358 #>>44371628 #>>44371891 #>>44371914 #>>44371978 #>>44372301 #>>44372892 #>>44373260 #>>44373493 #>>44373864 #>>44374419 #>>44374747 #>>44376761 #>>44377612 #>>44379849 #
hu3 ◴[] No.44371022[source]
What model? It got right first try here with your exact prompt using the free GPT-4.1 model.

https://i.imgur.com/toLzwCk.png

ffmpeg -i movie.mov -c:v libx264 -preset medium -crf 23 -c:a aac -b:a 128k movie.mp4

BUT, I have this in my copilot-instructions.md file:

    # Always follow these steps when responding to any request
    1. Please do a round of thinking in <thinking></thinking> tags
    2. Then a round of self-critique in <critique></critique> tags
    3. Then a final round of <thinking>, before responding.
    4. If you need more information, ask for it.
replies(1): >>44371054 #
easton ◴[] No.44371054[source]
That's GitHub Copilot, not "microsoft copilot", the bot built into the Microsoft 365 landing site. it doesn't give you model options, for example.
replies(3): >>44371112 #>>44371965 #>>44372474 #
clvx ◴[] No.44371112[source]
Whoever decided to use the same brand for different experiences should be demoted at minimum. What a way to destroy trust.
replies(8): >>44371158 #>>44371171 #>>44371521 #>>44371620 #>>44371716 #>>44371752 #>>44371783 #>>44373490 #
airstrike ◴[] No.44371158[source]
I suggest you never visit https://www.office.com/
replies(7): >>44371762 #>>44371935 #>>44372729 #>>44372743 #>>44374715 #>>44375584 #>>44376883 #
Lutger ◴[] No.44376883[source]
Wait, what? Is this a joke? Did they really rebrand Office to '365 Copilot app'? I feel like I'm missing the plot, they can't be serious.
replies(2): >>44377594 #>>44379096 #
1. mike_hearn ◴[] No.44377594{3}[source]
Don't worry, the other Office homepage says that it's actually been renamed to just Microsoft 365, not Microsoft 365 Copilot App:

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-offi...

I got there by going to office.com and clicking Products > Microsoft Office. Lol. Rofl, even. This has made my day. And we all thought calling their third generation console Xbox One was the worst possible branding decision.