←back to thread

Fairphone 6 is switching to a new design that's even more sustainable

(www.androidcentral.com)
401 points Bluestein | 1 comments | 23 Jun 25 15:29 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[24 Jun 25 00:43 UTC] No.44361743[source]▶
When unscrewed, users are likely to be greeted with an option to remove the battery as well as it isn’t attached to the device with the help of glue but rather with additional screws.

What a horrible state of things that "not gluing the battery in place but screwing it in" is considered an improvement. IMHO smartphones have been on a horrible decline ever since ~2016. Before then, most Androids had [1] easily replaceable battery, no tools required at all; [2] microSD slot; [3] headphone jack; [4] (many) dual SIM; [5] (many cheaper models) easily rooted or unlocked by default. Now all we get are faster CPUs, more (non-expandable) storage, and far too many cameras.

There was also this memorable ad from Samsung: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hIoyb9L5g0

replies(7): >>44362671 #>>44362689 #>>44363571 #>>44364331 #>>44364467 #>>44364757 #>>44365803 #
ben-schaaf ◴[24 Jun 25 03:47 UTC] No.44362689[source]▶
FairPhone used to be a manufacturer still doing the right things. My FP3 has all of that, including an official guide for unlocking the bootloader. At least they've kept their promises regarding updates, because I won't be buying their newer phones.
replies(3): >>44362799 #>>44363394 #>>44364032 #
1dom ◴[24 Jun 25 08:34 UTC] No.44364032[source]▶
I find this comment really irritating, sorry. This is a thread about the upcoming fairphone, with people praising things done right.

Your comment feel needlessly provocative with no information other than your negative opinion. You've implied Fairphone have turned crap, whilst mentioning a bunch of good stuff they've done, and then how you won't be buying their phones anymore.

Seriously, what was the point of this comment, what were you trying to achieve or communicate? Is that fairphone are rubbish? If so, you haven't said how or why, other than cryptic hints that promises might not have been kept.

This feels like an engagement bait comment, and I can't help but engage to say that.

replies(1): >>44364300 #
ben-schaaf ◴[24 Jun 25 09:26 UTC] No.44364300[source]▶
I guess if you're not familiar with fairphones products my comment's pretty meaningless, sorry. The parent comment implied that manufacturers stopped having all the listed features after 2016, but fairphone was still doing all that up until 2021. That's why I bought their phone. Then they removed the headphone jack in the 4, and now they're removing tool-less battery/sim replacement. That's why I won't be buying another one; I'll be keeping my FP3 until modern web bloat makes it entirely unusable (which I can only do because fairphone keeps their update promises).
replies(2): >>44364643 #>>44364782 #
filmor ◴[24 Jun 25 10:56 UTC] No.44364782[source]▶
If you have a FP3, did it never fall down, throwing its battery out? I had that happen a few times to me in the past and I always wished for a tiny bit more "grip" on the battery. I would guess that I'm not the only one.
replies(1): >>44368337 #
ben-schaaf ◴[24 Jun 25 17:02 UTC] No.44368337[source]▶
Nope, not once. It's been dropped plenty of times and had both the screen and battery replaced.
replies(1): >>44369289 #
1. borosuxks ◴[24 Jun 25 18:35 UTC] No.44369289[source]▶
Mine neither.

I've bought the FP3+ camera, and I'm on my third battery pack, degoogled with murena /e/-OS. Works perfectly, except the screen is a little too large for me. I wish it was a Sony Xperia ZX1 compact size, but one can't have it all.