←back to thread

741 points chirau | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.223s | source
Show context
theLiminator ◴[] No.44358222[source]
uv and ruff are a great counterexample to all those people who say "never reinvent the wheel". Don't ever do it just for the sake of doing it, but if you have focused goals you can sometimes produce a product that's an order of magnitude better.
replies(7): >>44358352 #>>44358435 #>>44358583 #>>44358604 #>>44360352 #>>44361046 #>>44362201 #
jjtheblunt ◴[] No.44358583[source]
> an order of magnitude better

off topic, but i wonder why that phrase gets used rather than 10x which is much shorter.

replies(9): >>44358607 #>>44358618 #>>44358728 #>>44358740 #>>44358916 #>>44359021 #>>44359027 #>>44359304 #>>44359387 #
1. screye ◴[] No.44358916[source]
It's meant to signify a step change. Order of magnitude change = no amount of incremental changes would make up for it.

In common conversation, the multiplier can vary from 2x - 10x. In context of some algorithms, order of magnitudes can be over the delta rather than absolutes. eg: an algorithms sees 1.1x improvement over the previous 10 years. A change that shows a 1.1x improvement by itself, overshadows an an order-of-magnitude more effort.

For salaries, I've used order-of-magnitude to mean 2x. Good way to show a step change in a person's perceived value in the market.