←back to thread

1168 points fellerts | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
1. petermcneeley ◴[] No.44347900[source]
The suspension (supports) should not be visible if it has the same index of refraction.
replies(1): >>44348091 #
2. fellerts ◴[] No.44348091[source]
Yep, nylon and epoxy resin have similar indices of refraction, but it's not perfect. I tried casting thin rods out of epoxy to replace the nylon but failed to achieve a good result.
replies(2): >>44348238 #>>44351821 #
3. buserror ◴[] No.44348238[source]
Have you tried Fluorocarbon? this has replaced Nylon for many fishing use (fly fishing in any case), it has a different refraction index -- not sure if it would be closer, or further from the resin, but at least it is different! :-)
replies(1): >>44348417 #
4. fellerts ◴[] No.44348417{3}[source]
Never tried, because fluorocarbon's index of refraction (1.42-ish) is further from epoxy resin (1.50-1.57) than nylon (1.53). It does make sense that fluorocarbon has replaced nylon because it's going to be less visible in water (1.33).

I guess the epoxy's index of refraction depends on all kinds of factors such as the mixing ratio and the conditions under which it cures.

5. discobean ◴[] No.44351821[source]
Couldn't you make little sticks with the same epoxy resin to hold up all the parts?
replies(1): >>44354302 #
6. fellerts ◴[] No.44354302{3}[source]
I tried, but they're very difficult to cast. Epoxy resin is also very brittle and difficult to cut neat and square. A jagged edge does not bond very well to a smooth surface.