←back to thread

523 points sva_ | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.448s | source
Show context
Zaheer ◴[] No.44314495[source]
Original DHS Announcement on Social Media Screening: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-to-begin-sc...

State Dept on what is considered Antisemitism: https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/

These definitions are intentionally broad and designed to censor criticism of Israel. You have more freedom to criticize the US Government than to criticize a foreign country.

replies(13): >>44314526 #>>44314820 #>>44315087 #>>44315104 #>>44315309 #>>44315447 #>>44315680 #>>44316478 #>>44316738 #>>44318457 #>>44319156 #>>44322666 #>>44327381 #
WatchDog ◴[] No.44315447[source]
Wow these are incredibly broad, in particular:

> Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

There are plenty of dual citizens that would proudly admit that their first loyalty is to Israel.

Other examples from the document use the term "Jews as a people", whereas this example seems to apply to accusing any individual.

Although perhaps a generous interpretation of the example, is that it excludes Israeli dual citizens, because Israel would be one of "their own nations"

replies(11): >>44315473 #>>44315607 #>>44316273 #>>44316424 #>>44316880 #>>44316897 #>>44317292 #>>44318124 #>>44318487 #>>44323278 #>>44323640 #
lazyeye ◴[] No.44316897[source]
It's all so confusing. Defending Jewish people is very unexpected behaviour for someone, who we've been told for years now, is a nazi...
replies(7): >>44317075 #>>44317106 #>>44317174 #>>44317278 #>>44318053 #>>44321937 #>>44336878 #
1. viraptor ◴[] No.44317278[source]
It's just convenient right now, not a part of ideology of protecting minorities. Consider how this is effectively a type of targeted affirmative action just a short time after all dei was the devil and had to be erased. If Israel does something the gov doesn't support, I expect all of this to go away.
replies(1): >>44407397 #
2. lazyeye ◴[] No.44407397[source]
Not sure how much value your "expectations" have but thanks for sharing...