←back to thread

523 points sva_ | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.434s | source
Show context
testfoobar ◴[] No.44314177[source]
Outside of just wanting privacy for its own sake, there are many, many reasons to keep social media profiles private: health privacy, sexual orientation privacy, relationship privacy, location privacy, financial privacy, etc.

“To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M and J non-immigrant visas will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to ‘public’”, the official said.

replies(4): >>44314266 #>>44314635 #>>44315092 #>>44315430 #
Mountain_Skies ◴[] No.44314266[source]
Much of the world is against LBGTQ+ rights. If an immigrant has social media posts expressing open hatred and even calls for violence against people with sexual orientations not approved of in their home culture, will you still have an open mind about welcoming them in the US with open arms?

This isn't theoretical. Both China and India, the two countries that supply the most students to the US, prohibit marriage equality. Both have extensive discrimination throughout their societies, both at the government and cultural levels.

replies(8): >>44314297 #>>44314298 #>>44314330 #>>44314358 #>>44314382 #>>44314615 #>>44314676 #>>44316550 #
bigyabai ◴[] No.44314676[source]
Many Americans have never seriously looked at a map before. Should they be categorically denied entry to foreign countries for their stereotypical ignorance?

Here in America, you can't put someone on trial for a crime they haven't committed. Even if you think they're from a suspicious country. That's called racial profiling, and it's forbidden by civil rights laws for a reason; nobody should have to tolerate the indignation of their peer's stupidity.

replies(4): >>44314793 #>>44315056 #>>44315196 #>>44315217 #
Freedom2 ◴[] No.44314793[source]
> Here in America, you can't put someone on trial for a crime they haven't committed

Actually in the US you can - it's why there's stories of innocent men and women being released from jail after other evidence proves their innocence (eg: DNA).

replies(1): >>44315034 #
1. bigyabai ◴[] No.44315034[source]
That's exactly why they're being released, though. If you manufacture a bogus case or plant evidence against someone, that's not probable cause. You're not acting within the acceptable norms of a just society, and the rectification of these cases is proof. Oftentimes the falsely persecuted will countersue, especially if they get an early injunction.
replies(1): >>44326845 #
2. chrz ◴[] No.44326845[source]
These people spend years in prison before "correcting" that small mistake