←back to thread

69 points robaato | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.248s | source
Show context
threeducks ◴[] No.44083409[source]
> But we have two Echo devices in our household and the data shows whether a request came from the Echo Plus in the kitchen or the original Echo on our daughter Coco’s bedside table, where it has sat since around her ninth birthday. [...] So I now know that it was Coco who wanted to know what it is to be omnisexual and what omniscient means.

Doesn't it feel wrong to the author to snoop through that private information? And publishing it in a news article definitely crosses a line.

replies(6): >>44083537 #>>44083667 #>>44083719 #>>44083814 #>>44083873 #>>44083895 #
daveguy ◴[] No.44083873[source]
Two questions,

1) What sensitive information was published in this article besides some superficial listening preferences and some Alexa interactions we have all had? I'm not sure identifying the extent of the use of the prefix "omni" is particularly sensitive information. It's not like anyone was divulging personal preference by asking for definitions.

2) What makes you think the author didn't run it by their family before submitting the story?

replies(1): >>44083984 #
1. garbagewoman ◴[] No.44083984[source]
To answer 2, a lack of any reference to permission being sought is the obvious answer