←back to thread

526 points cactusplant7374 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
999900000999 ◴[] No.44076233[source]
>Though I and my wife do not presently live in Massena, we live nearby, and we’re doing exactly this — we do not have an automobile, nor do we want one. We use the rural county transit bus, which we have found to be extremely cheap and quite reliable; and it has certainly saved us thousands and thousands of dollars by liberating us from the onerous expense of keeping a car.

This part has me screaming shenanigans. Unless you basically don't leave the house, you need a car outside of like 8 American cities. More believable would be a pair of used bikes.

replies(5): >>44076636 #>>44076913 #>>44076976 #>>44077424 #>>44084527 #
bombcar ◴[] No.44076913[source]
That’s obviously not true, if you change what you “have” to go to.

There are thousands of American towns that are about 10k population - large enough to have a Walmart and other stores, small enough to walk across in an hour or so.

replies(4): >>44077037 #>>44077156 #>>44077444 #>>44093176 #
cozzyd ◴[] No.44077037[source]
While such towns may have walkable cores, often places like Walmart are a huge pain to walk to.
replies(1): >>44077602 #
Aeolun ◴[] No.44077602[source]
If you need only $400 a month, you have a looot of time to spend walking to Walmart.
replies(1): >>44078025 #
cozzyd ◴[] No.44078025[source]
It's not the distance, but hostile roads with no safe crossings.
replies(2): >>44080142 #>>44082285 #
1. lolinder ◴[] No.44082285{3}[source]
We're talking about towns of 10k. Traffic in these towns is pretty sparse and easily navigable as a pedestrian.