←back to thread

461 points axelfontaine | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
vesinisa ◴[] No.44039149[source]
Here's a much better article from the Finnish public broadcaster giving more context: https://yle.fi/a/74-20161606

My comments:

The important thing to note that at this point it's just a political posturing and an announcement of intent. They haven't shown any concrete technical plan how this would actually be executed.

> "Of course, we are very pragmatic and realistic, we cannot do this in five years. Planning will continue until the end of the decade, and maybe in 2032 we can start construction."

Once they have the cost estimates and effects on existing rail traffic studied, I bet construction will never start.

replies(10): >>44039465 #>>44039611 #>>44039693 #>>44039743 #>>44039754 #>>44039771 #>>44039846 #>>44040123 #>>44040743 #>>44045724 #
zokier ◴[] No.44039846[source]
There is one reason for optimism here: Finnish rail network is in quite poor shape and needs major work done anyways. So switching gauge allows funneling more EU funding into these projects that would need to be done either way. I imagine that e.g. the infamous Suomi-rata and ELSA projects will be revived as gauge switch.
replies(2): >>44040119 #>>44041164 #
ljlolel ◴[] No.44040119[source]
And would deter Russian invasion (supply lines rule everything around me) which would significantly reduce their large military spending.
replies(2): >>44040158 #>>44040190 #
FpUser ◴[] No.44040190[source]
Now you owe me a coffee and a keyboard
replies(1): >>44042385 #
1. ◴[] No.44042385[source]