(yle.fi)

Show context

I wonder if there will be measures for backwards compatibility in the transition period. Like having dual track widths.

There's only 89mm difference between the two widths - I'd guess that isn't enough room to have both on the same track.

2. M95D ◴[20 May 25 08:42 UTC] No.44039254[source]▶

This is how it looks (Galati, Romania):

replies(1): >>44039457 #

3. HPsquared ◴[20 May 25 09:13 UTC] No.44039457[source]▶

I can only imagine what the switches look like.

4. ◴[20 May 25 09:27 UTC] No.44039557{3}[source]▶

5. Akronymus ◴[20 May 25 10:17 UTC] No.44039858{3}[source]▶

6. wasmitnetzen ◴[20 May 25 10:59 UTC] No.44040078[source]▶

There's already some dual-gauge track on the border with Sweden in Haparanda/Tornio[1].

Finland announces migration of its rail network to international gauge