←back to thread

461 points axelfontaine | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.407s | source | bottom
1. worldsayshi ◴[] No.44039094[source]
I wonder if there will be measures for backwards compatibility in the transition period. Like having dual track widths.
replies(3): >>44039137 #>>44039255 #>>44039503 #
2. helsinkiandrew ◴[] No.44039137[source]
There's only 89mm difference between the two widths - I'd guess that isn't enough room to have both on the same track.
replies(2): >>44039254 #>>44040078 #
3. M95D ◴[] No.44039254[source]
This is how it looks (Galati, Romania):

https://greatnews.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/linia-ferata...

replies(1): >>44039457 #
4. Sharlin ◴[] No.44039255[source]
The only feasible way to do this (based on preliminary reports) is to simply build new track next to old track in the same right-of-way. The transition period would last decades.
5. HPsquared ◴[] No.44039457{3}[source]
I can only imagine what the switches look like.
replies(2): >>44039557 #>>44039858 #
6. M95D ◴[] No.44039503[source]
I very much doubt it. Change to dual-gauge requires replacing the sleepers, and if they do the very hard work of replacing the sleepers, then why keep broad gauge?

Maybe they would choose to downgrade a single track where there's two, and half of each station's lines, but that would make it very difficult to schedule trains in both directions on a single track. So, they're probably not going to do that either.

7. ◴[] No.44039557{4}[source]
8. Akronymus ◴[] No.44039858{4}[source]
I believe something like this: https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F8...
9. wasmitnetzen ◴[] No.44040078[source]
There's already some dual-gauge track on the border with Sweden in Haparanda/Tornio[1].

[1]: https://maps.app.goo.gl/qjRZTz3K9sbVYpDX6