←back to thread

1257 points jbredeche | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
efilife ◴[] No.43999602[source]
[flagged]
replies(8): >>43999637 #>>43999730 #>>43999846 #>>44000007 #>>44000121 #>>44000458 #>>44000502 #>>44014742 #
tomhow ◴[] No.44014742[source]
We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43998721 and marked it off topic.

Please observe the guidelines, especially these ones:

Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>44023676 #
efilife ◴[] No.44023676[source]
can you tell me which rule the comment broke?
replies(1): >>44025411 #
tomhow ◴[] No.44025411[source]
I suggested a few that covered your multiple comments in the subthread, and also people who are sincere about using HN in accordance with the guidelines and the site's intended purpose have a way of demonstrating it through their actions. If you want to contribute here, please make an effort to be a positive contributor.
replies(1): >>44026419 #
efilife ◴[] No.44026419[source]
> I suggested a few that covered your multiple comments in the subthread

I genuinely can't link any of these to any of my comments, that's why I'm asking. I reread those a couple of times. I really think I've been polite, and I really tried to be, even when called "beteft of humanity", "earnest" and accused of trolling. I did not insult anybody, didn't want to and I certainly didn't want to bring anyone down. I just asked a question that seemed (and still seems) logical to me, only to get shutdown by mass flagging, now by removal of the comment with no real explanation what rules I broke and why I was negative

replies(1): >>44026988 #
tomhow ◴[] No.44026988[source]
OK, maybe there's a cultural or language disconnect here, so, if you're genuinely confused as to why this came across as offensive, I believe you.

Please just understand that it can be upsetting to many people in the HN audience, as evidenced by the votes and comments, when the topic of death is addressed in this way: i.e., in a way that seems hyper-rationalist and diminishing of the way premature death – especially of infants and children – is particularly devastating to parents and loved ones.

replies(2): >>44035749 #>>44035754 #
1. efilife ◴[] No.44035749[source]
[delayed]