←back to thread

127 points teleforce | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.382s | source
Show context
ars ◴[] No.44019505[source]
The article says it lost power, but the photo shows a wind powered vessel with sails.

Some kind of hybrid ship?

replies(6): >>44019537 #>>44019538 #>>44019540 #>>44019737 #>>44019755 #>>44020294 #
SllX ◴[] No.44019538[source]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cuauht%C3%A9moc_(BE01)

Looks like it. It’s a sail training ship, but it has an engine looking at the infobox, presumably so it’s not relying on the sails for tours such as this, and maybe because the ship itself is for training and they need a failsafe? To be honest, I’m not gathering what the purpose of such a ship is to a modern Navy other than maintaining cultural continuity and a tradition in wind sailing.

EDIT: I'm still inside the edit window but there have been several good answers below. Rather than responding to each one individually let me just say y'all have provided some great answers. Thanks!

replies(2): >>44019558 #>>44021320 #
Tomte ◴[] No.44019558[source]
Learning the fundamentals.

Germany puts all aspiring naval officers through a tour on the Gorch Fock.

It‘s kot just culture, although those ships also serve as excellent ambassadors to far-flung countries.

replies(3): >>44019593 #>>44019614 #>>44019749 #
raverbashing ◴[] No.44019614[source]
I suppose "not hitting bridges" is part of the fundamentals

But it's really curious how it seems those collisions have been becoming more frequent (or only our awareness of it?)

Another alternative is "the sort" working better than ever which means that maritime employment in some places does not attract the best professionals

replies(2): >>44019661 #>>44019665 #
defrost ◴[] No.44019661[source]
To be fair "can this ship clear this bridge given it's height, the time of day, the general broad area tidal conditions and the specific hyper local variations" is fundemental but far from basic.

It also raises a question as to whether the fault lies with the ship crew or with a local pilot who had local control of the ship.

replies(2): >>44019770 #>>44019868 #
usrusr ◴[] No.44019770[source]
On the videos the ship is drifting backwards, from wind and/or currents (are currents the East River dominated by tides?). I don't think that they ever intended to clear the bridge. The fundamental they missed was keeping their maneuvering engine up and running (or calling in some tugs).
replies(3): >>44019894 #>>44019994 #>>44020518 #
a2tech ◴[] No.44020518[source]
If you watch the video you can see tugs moving the boat. Current speculation is that the tugs/harbor captain messed up and the ship got away from them in the tide and drifted backwards into the bridge.
replies(1): >>44020968 #
1. Polizeiposaune ◴[] No.44020968[source]
Tugs were nearby; one had helped it back away from the pier it had been docked at, but none were hooked up at the time of the collision.

Sal Mercogliano — a maritime historian at Campbell University - saw indications that the ship's engine may have been stuck in reverse.

See video edited from his livestream here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2p9bYfFhHE