←back to thread

354 points carabiner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
jrochkind1 ◴[] No.44010400[source]
you'd think that such a widely cited fraudulent paper might have caused problems in other research, but probably nobody who cited it actually read it anyway, so. it's turtles all the way down.
replies(2): >>44011583 #>>44014466 #
generationP ◴[] No.44011583[source]
That looks like the kind of paper that causes companies to lose lots of money by hyping up what is likely a less-than-impressive method. But it does not make any theoretical claims, so it cannot contaminate research.
replies(1): >>44012090 #
jrochkind1 ◴[] No.44012090[source]
I wonder why it is so cited in the literature.
replies(1): >>44013397 #
1. griffzhowl ◴[] No.44013397[source]
AI hype, a write-up in WSJ with superlative comments from famous MIT profs. Should do it.

Most of the citations are to other papers on preprint servers and I guess a lot of people were working on similar themes and added it as a reference