←back to thread

281 points carabiner | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. jrochkind1 ◴[] No.44010400[source]
you'd think that such a widely cited fraudulent paper might have caused problems in other research, but probably nobody who cited it actually read it anyway, so. it's turtles all the way down.
replies(1): >>44011583 #
2. generationP ◴[] No.44011583[source]
That looks like the kind of paper that causes companies to lose lots of money by hyping up what is likely a less-than-impressive method. But it does not make any theoretical claims, so it cannot contaminate research.
replies(1): >>44012090 #
3. jrochkind1 ◴[] No.44012090[source]
I wonder why it is so cited in the literature.