←back to thread

A Research Preview of Codex

(openai.com)
511 points meetpateltech | 4 comments | 16 May 25 15:02 UTC | HN request time: 0.704s | source
Show context
kleiba ◴[16 May 25 15:59 UTC] No.44006997[source]▶
Just curious: is your company happy sharing their code-base with an AI provider? Or are you using a local installation?
replies(5): >>44007019 #>>44007041 #>>44007283 #>>44008574 #>>44009896 #
asadm ◴[16 May 25 16:01 UTC] No.44007019[source]▶
why not? OpenAI won't be stupid to look at my code and be that vulnerable legally. It ain't worth it.
replies(1): >>44009995 #
1. KaiserPro ◴[16 May 25 21:39 UTC] No.44009995[source]▶
They literally scraped half of youtube, made a library to extract the audio and released it as whisper.

Of _course_ they are training on your shit.

replies(1): >>44011856 #
2. asadm ◴[17 May 25 03:37 UTC] No.44011856[source]▶
thats publicly accessible shit. my code is trade secret and IP. I would litigate that shit if a line I wrote ends up in public model, easiest money to be made.
replies(2): >>44011973 #>>44012663 #
3. frontalier ◴[17 May 25 04:07 UTC] No.44011973[source]▶
you will litigate nothing, and if you do you'll be dismissed anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shira_Perlmutter#Firing

4. KaiserPro ◴[17 May 25 07:29 UTC] No.44012663[source]▶
> my code is trade secret and IP

Which is the same law that protects "publicly accessible shit".

In the same way that you can't legally just rip MP3s off the internet[1], or copy movies and distribute them.

[1] unless you're rich.