←back to thread

Material 3 Expressive

(design.google)
335 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | 13 May 25 17:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.4s | source
Show context
hexomancer ◴[16 May 25 10:46 UTC] No.44003783[source]▶
It's funny that the people who designed this monstrosity of a web page feel qualified enough to advice other people about design.
replies(2): >>44003969 #>>44004050 #
arewethereyeta ◴[16 May 25 11:16 UTC] No.44003969[source]▶
Who would be qualified enough to talk with you about new design trends then?those that design on your taste? Rarely, if ever, new design trends are liked by everyone. All in all, I think they are qualified enough.
replies(4): >>44004114 #>>44004421 #>>44004567 #>>44004686 #
1. albedoa ◴[16 May 25 12:23 UTC] No.44004567[source]▶
> Who would be qualified enough to talk with you about new design trends then?

The person you are asking did not say anything about new design trends.

But anyway, if one is calling this page a monstrosity, then it seems in bad faith for you to ask that question on the same line where you call its designers "qualified enough".

Would you consider an answer that excludes anyone who thinks that these designers are qualified? Would you consider any answer that disagrees with your assessment, or have you already made up your mind?

replies(1): >>44005895 #
2. arewethereyeta ◴[16 May 25 14:24 UTC] No.44005895[source]▶
not really, I still consider them qualified enough to push new stuff. Wether it's a good or bad movement I see them as qualified yes. I was not refering to the page but the people behind the design proposal. I, for one, was never a big fan of material design even though I implemented it in some projects. I am still open to new stuff. I've seen people here calling shadcn a monstruosity for example.