←back to thread

Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment

(www.nytimes.com)

1257 points jbredeche | 3 comments | 15 May 25 18:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.785s | source

Show context

efilife ◴[15 May 25 21:41 UTC] No.43999602[source]▶

>>43997636 (OP) #

[flagged]

replies(8): >>43999637 #>>43999730 #>>43999846 #>>44000007 #>>44000121 #>>44000458 #>>44000502 #>>44014742 #

koala_man ◴[15 May 25 23:53 UTC] No.44000502[source]▶

[flagged]

replies(4): >>44000616 #>>44000790 #>>44002876 #>>44014779 #

1. concordDance ◴[16 May 25 08:03 UTC] No.44002876[source]▶

What was the question? The rampant flagging here is quite annoying.

replies(1): >>44002925 #

2. efilife ◴[16 May 25 08:11 UTC] No.44002925[source]▶

>>44002876 (TP) #

My original comment said:

> But your child will die and that's a fact. Is it only ok for it to die after you?

replies(1): >>44005618 #

3. imacomputertoo ◴[16 May 25 13:58 UTC] No.44005618[source]▶

Is there more context to this question? I couldn't read the article because of the pay wall. But in isolation, this is a dumb question. All decent parents want their child to live as long as possible and be as healthy as possible. Is there something deeper you were trying to get at?