←back to thread

Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment

(www.nytimes.com)
1257 points jbredeche | 1 comments | 15 May 25 18:06 UTC | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
efilife ◴[15 May 25 21:41 UTC] No.43999602[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(8): >>43999637 #>>43999730 #>>43999846 #>>44000007 #>>44000121 #>>44000458 #>>44000502 #>>44014742 #
morepedantic ◴[15 May 25 22:45 UTC] No.44000121[source]▶
Edgy! No one has ever considered the mortality of their children ever, or contemplated the difference between death before and after the realization of potential. Wow!
replies(1): >>44000364 #
efilife ◴[15 May 25 23:24 UTC] No.44000364[source]▶
Genuinely don't know why this is edgy. I was trying to understand his logic
replies(1): >>44000447 #
cluse ◴[15 May 25 23:42 UTC] No.44000447[source]▶
Having a child predecease you is one of the worst things that can happen to a person in general. This is a common sentiment in humans. The strange thing is that you mentioned you're trying to follow "logic." This is not logic. These are emotions.
replies(1): >>44000594 #
efilife ◴[16 May 25 00:10 UTC] No.44000594[source]▶
I understand this. My question arose from the fact that it seems like he only cares about the child dying before him, not the child's death overall. It was

> the idea of being told my 1 week old baby is going to die

not

> the idea of my child dying

replies(2): >>44000744 #>>44004539 #
1. viewtransform ◴[16 May 25 00:37 UTC] No.44000744[source]▶
"I am simply a machine. I do not experience death as humans do. It is just a cessation of function." - Data in Star Trek The Next Generation,