←back to thread

491 points anigbrowl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
jillesvangurp ◴[] No.43981512[source]
I like this; it's smart. It's a low tech solution that simply coordinates transit based on demand and self optimizes to serve that demand.

The value of buses and trains running on schedule is mainly that you can plan around it. But what if transit worked like Uber. Some vehicle shows up to pick you up. It might drop you off somewhere to switch vehicles and some other vehicle shows up to do that. All the way to your destination (as opposed to a mile away from there). As long as the journey time is predictable and reasonable, people would be pretty happy with that.

replies(14): >>43981629 #>>43981734 #>>43981761 #>>43981832 #>>43982029 #>>43982065 #>>43982311 #>>43982461 #>>43984012 #>>43984218 #>>43985477 #>>43987281 #>>43987568 #>>43988589 #
dist-epoch ◴[] No.43982029[source]
This will never work in US for two reasons:

1. removes control from local authorities - "we are supposed to decide for our citizens, not them"

2. NIMBYs will oppose the bus passing on their street - "too much noise, peoples, ..."

replies(2): >>43982180 #>>43982368 #
1. pjc50 ◴[] No.43982368[source]
> NIMBYs will oppose the bus passing on their street

Why do they get a say on buses? You don't get to veto other drivers even in front of your own house.

replies(1): >>43984252 #
2. seb1204 ◴[] No.43984252[source]
Busses will be electric soon, silent then