←back to thread

606 points saikatsg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
comeonbro ◴[] No.43928978[source]
As a record of how likely people considered this outcome:

Prevost was hovering around 1% on Polymarket, and was <0.5% between white smoke and announcement.

replies(5): >>43929198 #>>43929211 #>>43929981 #>>43930813 #>>43932107 #
kylehotchkiss ◴[] No.43932107[source]
"people" "Polymarket"

How many non-technical people are on polymarket? That seems like a poor sample size.

replies(1): >>43932472 #
pie_flavor ◴[] No.43932472[source]
One of two things must be true: Either Polymarket's more accurate than you are, or you can make free money.
replies(3): >>43932554 #>>43933519 #>>43934494 #
1. ookdatnog ◴[] No.43934494{3}[source]
Suppose I gave Provost 5% chance of winning the papal election. Then I would have been more accurate than Polymarket. But I wouldn't call betting on what I perceive as 5% chance of winning "making free money"; from my perspective it would still be a wild risk to bet any significant money on that outcome.