←back to thread

A $20k American-made electric pickup with no paint, no stereo, no screen

(www.theverge.com)
1457 points kwindla | 1 comments | 25 Apr 25 15:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
guywithahat ◴[25 Apr 25 20:24 UTC] No.43798166[source]▶
The issue with this is they claim the cost savings came from not having a screen and other silly features, but that’s not where money is spent.

The real cost savings came a tiny, 150 mile battery. It could easily be <100 miles loaded up after a few years of use, which means there are very few use cases for this truck, and it certainly doesn’t make sense without the tax credit. Cool idea, but there’s no getting around the price of batteries

replies(4): >>43798328 #>>43798336 #>>43798650 #>>43801549 #
ceejayoz ◴[25 Apr 25 20:43 UTC] No.43798328[source]▶
There are plenty of use cases for a ~100 mile truck.
replies(3): >>43798532 #>>43798579 #>>43798972 #
eightys3v3n ◴[25 Apr 25 21:13 UTC] No.43798579[source]▶
I would buy a 160km truck to drive to and from work.
replies(2): >>43799282 #>>43800760 #
saagarjha ◴[26 Apr 25 03:46 UTC] No.43800760[source]▶
I'm curious what kind of workplace you go to regularly that a truck is a good option for?
replies(1): >>43812579 #
1. Marsymars ◴[27 Apr 25 15:26 UTC] No.43812579[source]▶
This truck is compact/low-cost enough that you could commute to a city job, and its competitors for that are basically the Leaf, Bolt, Fiat 500e, Kia Niro and Hyundai Kona.

The bed is pointless for commuting, but so are the back seats in any of those other cars.

I commute in a Fiesta, and it’s been years since anybody has sat in the back seats.