←back to thread

1329 points kwindla | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
guywithahat ◴[] No.43798166[source]
The issue with this is they claim the cost savings came from not having a screen and other silly features, but that’s not where money is spent.

The real cost savings came a tiny, 150 mile battery. It could easily be <100 miles loaded up after a few years of use, which means there are very few use cases for this truck, and it certainly doesn’t make sense without the tax credit. Cool idea, but there’s no getting around the price of batteries

replies(4): >>43798328 #>>43798336 #>>43798650 #>>43801549 #
ceejayoz ◴[] No.43798328[source]
There are plenty of use cases for a ~100 mile truck.
replies(3): >>43798532 #>>43798579 #>>43798972 #
1. eightys3v3n ◴[] No.43798579[source]
I would buy a 160km truck to drive to and from work.
replies(2): >>43799282 #>>43800760 #
2. Jach ◴[] No.43799282[source]
You can get a lot of Uber rides for $20k.
replies(2): >>43799731 #>>43799873 #
3. monkaiju ◴[] No.43799731[source]
2 years worth according to my math using ride.guru and that's in advance. That also means I don't have a truck and I have to coordinate trips twice a day. And that strictly commuting, not accounting for all the other uses I have for a car...
4. ceejayoz ◴[] No.43799873[source]
$50-100 a day goes quicker than you’d think.
5. saagarjha ◴[] No.43800760[source]
I'm curious what kind of workplace you go to regularly that a truck is a good option for?