←back to thread

1321 points kwindla | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.075s | source | bottom
1. soared ◴[] No.43795110[source]
Does this strategy even make sense? You can charge $20k for a car. Why wouldn’t you add options that cost you nearly nothing but some amount of buyers will opt in for a meaningful revenue increase.

Charge $1k for paint. Even if 95% of people don’t do that, 5% of orders just increased their revenue by 5%. Paint doesn’t take engineering time.. just spend $500 and let some other company do it. This is why trims exist, having a single low price point means people who want to spend more either produce lower revenue than possible, or are disappointed.

IMO this one trim, one price is almost certainly a prelaunch marketing gimmick as from a business perspective there is literally no benefit.

replies(4): >>43795343 #>>43795419 #>>43795595 #>>43796197 #
2. disgruntled1901 ◴[] No.43795343[source]
> Paint doesn’t take engineering time.. just spend $500 and let some other company do it.

Are you sure you read the article? The is explicitly addressed.

replies(1): >>43795497 #
3. tetris11 ◴[] No.43795419[source]
I think it better if they just give options for easy modding. You take it to a garage for a mechanic to spray it, or to hollow out radio nook, or add a phone charger outlet.
4. soared ◴[] No.43795497[source]
DIY wrap kit I guess is a form of options, but again seems like a missed revenue opportunity. Some of your market wants DIY customization, but realistically some anmount of (or almost every) consumer would rather pay +$1000 for a nice colored than $400 for a wrap kit.
replies(1): >>43798095 #
5. joezydeco ◴[] No.43795595[source]
The moment you say "just", you've lost the argument.
6. __mharrison__ ◴[] No.43796197[source]
In the YT video (linked in another comment), it claims they save $350M by not building painting facilities.
7. ◴[] No.43798095{3}[source]