←back to thread

Crows can recognize geometric regularity

(phys.org)
178 points wglb | 4 comments | 17 Apr 25 14:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.816s | source
Show context
countWSS ◴[21 Apr 25 04:50 UTC] No.43748585[source]▶
Does the idea that "only humans can recognize shapes" sounds ridicolously outdated? Its like "Science confirms animals feel pain".
replies(8): >>43748640 #>>43748689 #>>43748707 #>>43748860 #>>43749392 #>>43753014 #>>43755142 #>>43758700 #
pjmlp ◴[21 Apr 25 05:24 UTC] No.43748707[source]▶
Given the ways of the current US administration, not so sure if that is even something open to discussion.
replies(1): >>43748846 #
xandrius ◴[21 Apr 25 06:00 UTC] No.43748846[source]▶
Why does everything need to devolve into a discussion or comment about US politics? Not everyone cares that much about it.
replies(1): >>43748940 #
pjmlp ◴[21 Apr 25 06:23 UTC] No.43748940[source]▶
Because of the ways it influence modern life, and technology choices.

Those that don't care will eventually find themselves on a situation where they will care, by then it will be too late.

replies(2): >>43749484 #>>43750684 #
1. porridgeraisin ◴[21 Apr 25 08:14 UTC] No.43749484[source]▶
> because of the ways it X

Because of the ways the benefactors want us to think it X

It really doesn't matter as much as the hysteria around it. Maybe the hysteria is 0.0001% accurate and that's generous. This is true for any political tribe, politics and political messaging in general.

replies(1): >>43752443 #
2. PhasmaFelis ◴[21 Apr 25 14:31 UTC] No.43752443[source]▶
Whatever your feelings on the current US administration, no reasonable person could deny that it's having significant effects worldwide.
replies(1): >>43759226 #
3. porridgeraisin ◴[22 Apr 25 05:10 UTC] No.43759226[source]▶
The economic priorities of the US will have significant effects worldwide even if you put a watermelon in the president's office. It has been having significant effects worldwide for the last 100 years. Politics has not changed this one bit.
replies(1): >>43820060 #
4. PhasmaFelis ◴[28 Apr 25 11:27 UTC] No.43820060{3}[source]▶
Some "significant effects" are a lot bigger and more broadly negative than others. You know this.